Wouldn’t the first Green Lantern movie be more interesting if it focused on John Stewart?
I mean, I love Hal, but his story arc is pretty much a straight line. The basic Green Lantern origin-story plot is “you are in over your head.” Here is a magic ring; now go fight aliens and fix problems.
With Hal, there’s no real story arc. Any complications (father issues! drunk driving!) seem artificial, because come on, he’s a test pilot. He’s got the right stuff already, so why are we wading through these subplots to see it?
Speaking broadly, Guy and Kyle exist primarily in relation to Hal. Guy is the star of the Green Lantern movie that Adam Sandler’s production company would make (har har, I’ll use the ring for hookers and blow!); and Kyle is the star of Disney’s (I am sensitive and I believe in myself!). Those are gross oversimplifications, to be sure, but I’m thinking two-minute trailers here — not a lot of room for nuance.
John, though … now there’s a movie-movie. Spend the first ten minutes on slice-of-life stuff for a socially-conscious architect. However, drop into the background a couple of news items: a polarizing politician’s visit, and Green Lantern saving a busload of school kids in Baltimore. The plot begins in earnest when Hal shows up to make John his deputy (and I did say make, because Hal and probably a big holographic Guardian head make it clear that John has no choice).
So yeah, it’s essentially an adaptation and expansion of John’s origin from the Denny O’Neil/Neal Adams Green Lantern #87, but really, isn’t that the kernel of a good movie all by itself? Here is Hal, representing (as he did originally) the establishment, having to train a new Lantern who he worries may not have the right attitude for the job; and here is John, wondering what in fact this new role means to his long-held beliefs. Sure, there are racial and political overtones, but it would have been a heck of an introduction to John, Hal, and the Green Lantern Corps.
Okay, gotta go. Back before too long.